Seven Year-Old Vaccine-Injured Boy Refused Compensation For Not Being Disabled Enough

Conclusion When it comes to compensation, many of the world’s governments shirk their responsibilities and turn a blind eye to suffering families. Families are repeatedly encouraged to apply for compensation even though the governments are fully aware that they will be refused compensation when they do. It is families like the Hadfields who need the money the most. Josh is a child who has clearly been injured after receiving a vaccination recommended by the government and yet his family has been refused compensation because the VDPU has deemed him as not disabled enough. How disabled does a child have to be, for goodness’ sake? It is possible that Josh will require a lifetime of care as a result of his injury. It is common sense that in his current condition, Josh can no longer be left alone. He is no longer safe to cross the road, walk down the stairs or play safely with his friends as a result of his injuries. Yet it is children like Josh, Katie and many others who are being refused compensation for severe injuries because they do not tick the tick boxes required. Even when families like these do fit the correct criteria to receive the compensation they so rightly deserve, their families could be penalized in other ways. Is this justice? After all, these are vaccines that our governments recommend as safe and effective. References http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2431811/Boy-7-developed-narcolepsy-swine-flu-jab-denied-compensation-ill–...
Source: vactruth.com - Category: Health Medicine and Bioethics Commentators Authors: Tags: Christina England Top Stories Josh Hadfield Lord Ashley narcolepsy Pandemrix swine flu vaccine injury vaccine injury compensation Source Type: blogs