Cutting Back on Meat? What to Know About the Reducetarian Movement
There’s a curious logic to environmentalism. We praise, in most cases, those who make incremental lifestyle adjustments to support environmental causes: turning off the lights before leaving your home or driving an electric vehicle is seen as a meaningful—albeit small—step, even if you don’t give up electricity for good. No one would shame you for not cooking your dinner with a fire from flint.
But the logic breaks down when animals are involved. Reducing meat consumption, without fully going vegan, is seen as a compromise, a slightly shameful cop-out. “Meatless Monday” is often accused of sloganeering, and “humane slaughter” is considered an oxymoron. But interestingly enough, the feelings between the accuser and the accused tend to be mutual: even those who have drastically cut their meat consumption—say, to once a year—often can’t shake a sense of complicity themselves. Many vegetarians harbor a lingering sense of guilt for not being vegan. The reducetarian movement and its leader, Brian Kateman, aim to change that.
[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]
Inadequate labels
The Reducetarian Foundation stresses the value of “the small changes in personal and institutional behavior that collectively result in a significant difference in the world.” Kateman, a Staten Island native, grew up with the standard meat-heavy American diet. But in 2010, when he was a junior in college, he was exposed t...
Source: TIME: Health - Category: Consumer Health News Authors: Sheon Han Tags: Uncategorized Diet & Nutrition freelance healthscienceclimate Source Type: news
More News: American Health | Biology | Cardiology | China Health | Cholesterol | Conferences | Dairy | Dementia | Diets | Environmental Health | Fundraising | Health | Heart | Marketing | Meat | Medical Ethics | Men | Middle East Health | Nutrition | Politics | Study | Trump | Turkey Health | USA Health | Vegan | Vegetables | Vegetarian | Women