Comparing ProKera With Amniotic Membrane Transplantation: Indications, Outcomes, and Costs
Conclusions:
ProKera allowed for a faster corneal healing than sutured AMT, although its total healed area was less than the latter. Moreover, ProKera is more cost-effective than AMT, thus reducing financial burden to our health care system.
Source: Cornea - Category: Opthalmology Tags: Clinical Science Source Type: research
More News: Brain | Burns | Canada Health | Chemistry | Corneal Transplant | Health Management | Herpes | Neurology | Neuroscience | Opthalmology | Science | Study | Transplants