To Compare the Anesthetic Effect of Remimazolam and Propofol in Painless Hysteroscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery
CONCLUSION: Intravenous induction of remimazolam at 6 mg·kg-1·h-1 and maintenance of anesthesia at 1-2 mg·kg-1·h-1 have less effect on hemodynamics, faster recovery time and lower incidence of adverse reactions compared with propofol when used in minimally invasive hysteroscopic surgery. Remimazolam can be safely and effectively used in this kind of surgery.PMID:38684498 | DOI:10.62713/aic.3291
Source: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia - Category: Surgery Authors: Fei Gao Yanjun Xie Hengwei Zhu Chen Chen Hongyan Fu Source Type: research
More News: Anesthesia | Anesthesiology | Arrhythmia | Cardiology | Depression | Diprivan | Heart | Hysteroscopy | Minimally Invasive Surgery | Pain | Propofol | Respiratory Medicine | Study | Surgery