Just Food: Why We Need to Think More About Decoupled Crop Subsidies as an Obligation to Justice

AbstractIn this article I respond to the obligation to institute the policy of decoupled crop subsidies as is provided in Pilchman ’s article “Money for Nothing: Are decoupled Crop Subsidies Just?” With growing problems of poor nutrition in the United States there have been two different but related phenomenon that have appeared. First, the obesity epidemic that has ravaged the nation and left an increasing number of peop le very unhealthy; and second, the phenomenon of food deserts where individuals are unable to access fresh fruits and vegetables. A possible solution to this problem, as has been proposed by some, is to institute a decoupled crop subsidy that would increase the production of fruits and vegetables in the United States. In this paper I explore the possible unintended consequences of this policy and how it may violate liberal international conceptions of justice. I conclude that there must be further empirical research before anyone can call decoupled crop subsidies an obligation to justice.
Source: Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics - Category: Medical Ethics Source Type: research