In Afghanistan, the Withdrawal of U.S. Troops is Long Overdue

Donald Trump announced a mini-surge of U.S. forces into Afghanistan a month ago. This week theLong War Journal reported the Taliban now control or contest45 percent of Afghanistan ’s districts, up from 40 percent three months prior, which was an increase from 34 percent a yearearlier, and you get the idea. The Taliban control more territory today than at any point since 2001, and they have the momentum.Sixteen years after invading Afghanistan, toppling the Taliban, and routing Al Qaeda elements there, U.S. goals remain as far out of reach as ever.However, rather than surge additional forces and fall victim to the “sunk cost” fallacy, the U.S. should withdraw military forces and re-align objectives to the threat and national interests. During his August speech, Donald Trump defended the surge by saying, “our nation must seek an honorable and enduring outcomeworthy of the tremendous sacrifices that have been made, especially the sacrifices of lives. ” His emotional appeal implied that grieving Gold Star families should be the nation’s impetus for continued involvement in the Afghan war (which would also lead to more families who would experience that ultimate loss).Instead of defending a surge on the basis of efforts already spent, U.S. policy towards Afghanistan should rely on the 16 years of data available since initiation of the war on terror. All of that data strongly communicates two points: 1) the terror threat to Americans remains low and 2) a strategy that e...
Source: Cato-at-liberty - Category: American Health Authors: Source Type: blogs