Resistance of Poliovirus 1 and Enterovirus A71 Against Alcohol and Other Disinfectants

This study compared the efficacies of 17 self-made alcohol-based hand sanitizers and 10 commercially available disinfectants (4 high-level, 4 intermediate-level, 2 low-level) against these two viruses. The results showed that by itself, ethanol needed to reach a concentration of 75% to meet the inactivation requirement of 4-log reduction in average TCID50 against PV 1. Nine out of 13 laboratory-formulated alcohol-based hand sanitizers reached the 4-log inactivation requirement against PV 1 after 4.5 min, while the remaining four sanitizers did not. Unexpectedly, none of the tested ethanol-based sanitizers inactivated EV A71 by 4-log. For the commercially available disinfectants, all four high-level and one intermediate-level disinfectants passed the inactivation requirements against both PV 1 and EV A71, while two intermediate-level disinfectants met the inactivation requirement against PV 1 but failed against EV A71. The last intermediate-level and both low-level disinfectants did not meet the requirement for either PV 1 or EV A71. Therefore, PV 1 is more susceptible to inactivation by many common alcohol-based and non-alcohol-based disinfectants than EV A71. Therefore, the adoption of EV A71 as the standard test virus would elevate the disinfectant requirement standard and provide better protection for the public. Based on these results, seven new alcohol-based hand sanitizer recipes were formulated and found to be effective against both PV 1 and EV A71, with two candidates...
Source: Journal of Virological Methods - Category: Virology Authors: Source Type: research