Comparison of long-term outcomes after trans-catheter aortic valve implantation between patients primarily diagnosed by cardiac murmur and those diagnosed by other reasons

by Yousuke Taniguchi, Kenichi Sakakura, Yohei Nomura, Masashi Hatori, Kaho Shibata, Yusuke Tamanaha, Taku Kasahara, Takunori Tsukui, Tatsuro Ibe, Kei Yamamoto, Hiroyuki Jinnouchi, Hiroshi Wada, Atsushi Yamaguchi, Hideo Fujita Careful auscultation is the first step to diagnose aortic stenosis (AS). The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) between the patients primarily diagnosed by heart murmur and those diagnosed by other reasons. We retrospectively included 258 patients who underwent TAVI in our medical center, and divided those into the murmur group (n = 81) and the other-reason group (n = 177) according to the primary reason for AS diagnosis. The primary endpoint was the major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), which was defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, hospitalization due to acute decompensated heart failure, and disabling stroke. The murmur group included younger patients than the other-reason group (82.8 year-old vs. 84.0 year-old, P = 0.02). History of AF was more frequently observed in the other-reason group than in the murmur group (21.5% vs. 7.4%, P
Source: PLoS One - Category: Biomedical Science Authors: Source Type: research