Mechanical circulatory support with Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump or medical treatment in cardiogenic shock —a critical appraisal of current data

ConclusionIn patients suffering from severe CS due to AMI, the use of Impella is not associated with improved short-time survival but with higher complications rates compared to IABP and medical treatment. Better patient selection avoiding Impella implantation in futile situations or in possible lower risk CS might be necessary to elucidate possible advantages of Impella in future studies.
Source: Clinical Research in Cardiology - Category: Cardiology Source Type: research