Research and Reviews in the Fastlane 195

This study finds an association between IO use and worse neuro outcomes but, the data is extremely limited due to a host of biases. It’s unclear why IO was chosen as the route and the IO group was sicker overall. Additionally, with no evidence for benefit of any meds in cardiac arrest, there isn’t even a physiologic basis for why IO would be worse than IV. Ultimately, only a randomized trial can give us any useful information. We should continue to de-emphasize the importance of obtaining access in arrest. Recommended by: Anand Swaminathan The R&R iconoclastic sneak peek icon key The list of contributors The R&R ARCHIVE R&R Hall of famer You simply MUST READ this! R&R Hot stuff! Everyone’s going to be talking about this R&R Landmark paper A paper that made a difference R&R Game Changer? Might change your clinical practice R&R Eureka! Revolutionary idea or concept R&R Mona Lisa Brilliant writing or explanation R&R Boffintastic High quality research R&R Trash Must read, because it is so wrong! R&R WTF! Weird, transcendent or funtabulous! That’s it for this week… That should keep you busy for a week at least! Thanks to our wonderful group of editors and contributors Leave a comment below if you have any queries, suggestions, or comments about this week’s R&R in the FASTLANE or if you want to tell us what you think is worth reading. Last update: Feb 15, 20...
Source: Life in the Fast Lane - Category: Emergency Medicine Authors: Tags: Education Emergency Medicine Pediatrics R&R in the FASTLANE Resuscitation literature recommendations research and reviews Source Type: blogs