Culprit Vessel-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis [Coronary Interventions]

Conclusions— This meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies suggests that in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction, there may be no significant benefit with single-stage MV-PCI compared with CO-PCI. Given the limitations of observational data, randomized trials are needed to determine the role of MV-PCI in this setting.

http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/11/e005582?rss=1

Source: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions - November 16, 2017 Category: Cardiology Authors: Kolte, D., Sardar, P., Khera, S., Zeymer, U., Thiele, H., Hochadel, M., Radovanovic, D., Erne, P., Hambraeus, K., James, S., Claessen, B. E., Henriques, J. P. S., Mylotte, D., Garot, P., Aronow, W. S., Owan, T., Jain, D., Panza, J. A., Frishman, W. H., Fo Tags: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Revascularization, Meta Analysis, Acute Coronary Syndromes Coronary Interventions Source Type: research