Impact of taxes and warning labels on red meat purchases among US consumers: A randomized controlled trial

by Lindsey Smith Taillie, Maxime Bercholz, Carmen E. Prestemon, Isabella C. A. Higgins, Anna H. Grummon, Marissa G. Hall, Lindsay M. Jaacks BackgroundPolicies to reduce red meat intake are important for mitigating climate change and improving public health. We tested the impact of taxes and warning labels on red meat purchases in the United States. The main study question was, will taxes and warning labels reduce red meat purchases? Methods and findingsWe recruited 3,518 US adults to participate in a shopping task in a naturalistic online grocery store from October 18, 2021 to October 28, 2021. Participants were randomized to one of 4 conditions: control (no tax or warning labels,n = 887), warning labels (health and environmental warning labels appeared next to products containing red meat,n = 891), tax (products containing red meat were subject to a 30% price increase,n = 874), or combined warning labels + tax (n = 866). We used fractional probit and Poisson regression models to assess the co-primary outcomes, percent, and count of red meat purchases, and linear regression to assess the secondary outcomes of nutrients purchased. Most participants identified as women, consumed red meat 2 or more times per week, and reported doing all of their household ’s grocery shopping. The warning, tax, and combined conditions led to lower percent of red meat–containing items purchased, with 39% (95% confidence interval (CI) [38%, 40%]) of control participants’ purchases containing ...
Source: PLoS Medicine - Category: Internal Medicine Authors: Source Type: research