Filtered By:
Drug: Pradaxa
Management: Medicare

This page shows you your search results in order of relevance.

Order by Relevance | Date

Total 49 results found since Jan 2013.

Abstract 11: Use of Novel Anticoagulants Among Atrial Fibrillation Patients Hospitalized with Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Registry Analysis Concurrent I Session B: Oral Abstract Presentations on Stroke Topics
Conclusion: Among patients with AF and acute ischemic stroke or TIA discharged on oral anticoagulants, NAC use remains low and is prescribed to younger, more functional, and lower risk patients.
Source: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes - May 15, 2013 Category: Cardiology Authors: Patel, P. A., Zhao, X., Fonarow, G. C., Lytle, B. L., Smith, E. E., Xian, Y., Bhatt, D. L., Peterson, E. D., Schwamm, L. H., Hernandez, A. F. Tags: Concurrent I Session B: Oral Abstract Presentations on Stroke Topics Source Type: research

Anticoagulation Use and Clinical Outcomes After Major Bleeding on Dabigatran or Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation Clinical Sciences
Conclusions—Dabigatran was associated with a superior benefit/risk ratio than warfarin and anticoagulation discontinuation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation patients who have survived a major bleed.
Source: Stroke - December 22, 2016 Category: Neurology Authors: Inmaculada Hernandez, Yuting Zhang, Maria M. Brooks, Paul K.L. Chin, Samir Saba Tags: Atrial Fibrillation, Quality and Outcomes, Intracranial Hemorrhage, Ischemic Stroke Original Contributions Source Type: research

Risk of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding and associated costs in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the United States Medicare population.
CONCLUSIONS: Among the DOACs in the study, only apixaban is associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding and lower related medical costs compared to warfarin. PMID: 28635338 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Source: Current Medical Research and Opinion - June 22, 2017 Category: Research Tags: Curr Med Res Opin Source Type: research

Risk of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding and associated costs in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the United States Medicare population: updated analysis
CONCLUSIONS: This real-world analysis showed DOACs to be associated with lower risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding, and lower medical costs compared to warfarin. Among them, only apixaban appears to be associated with a significantly lower risk of all three outcomes collectively: stroke/SE, major bleeding, and lower related medical costs compared to warfarin.PMID:35993487 | DOI:10.1080/03007995.2022.2115772
Source: Current Medical Research and Opinion - August 22, 2022 Category: Research Authors: Alpesh Amin Allison Keshishian Dionne M Hines Oluwaseyi Dina Hannah Le Lisa Rosenblatt Xianchen Liu Qisu Zhang Lien Vo Source Type: research

Cost-Effectiveness of Left Atrial Appendage Closure With the WATCHMAN Device Compared With Warfarin or Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Secondary Prevention in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Clinical Sciences
Conclusions—Upfront procedure costs initially make LAAC higher cost than warfarin and the non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, but within 10 years, LAAC delivers more quality-adjusted life years and has lower total costs, making LAAC the most cost-effective treatment strategy for secondary prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation.
Source: Stroke - May 25, 2018 Category: Neurology Authors: Vivek Y. Reddy, Ronald L. Akehurst, Stacey L. Amorosi, Meghan B. Gavaghan, Deanna S. Hertz, David R. Holmes Jr Tags: Atrial Fibrillation, Cost-Effectiveness Original Contributions Source Type: research

Comparison of Stroke- and Bleed-related Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs among Patients with Newly Diagnosed Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation and Newly Treated with Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, or Warfarin.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that dabigatran patients had lower bleed-related HCRU and lower bleed-related PPPM costs than rivaroxaban patients, and lower outpatient stroke-related HCRU, higher bleed-related outpatient HCRU, and lower bleed-related PPPM costs than warfarin patients. It provides valuable stroke-related and bleed-related HCRU and costs information among commercially-insured and Medicare patients. PMID: 30251553 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Source: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research - September 27, 2018 Category: Health Management Tags: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res Source Type: research

Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Health Services and Outcomes Research
Conclusions In patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, apixaban was associated with lower risks of both stroke and major bleeding, dabigatran was associated with similar risk of stroke but lower risk of major bleeding, and rivaroxaban was associated with similar risks of both stroke and major bleeding in comparison to warfarin.
Source: JAHA:Journal of the American Heart Association - June 12, 2016 Category: Cardiology Authors: Yao, X., Abraham, N. S., Sangaralingham, L. R., Bellolio, M. F., McBane, R. D., Shah, N. D., Noseworthy, P. A. Tags: Atrial Fibrillation, Secondary Prevention, Anticoagulants, Transplantation, Cerebrovascular Disease/Stroke Health Services and Outcomes Research Source Type: research

Comparing Stroke and Bleeding with Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran in Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of the US Medicare Part D Data
ConclusionsThere was no difference in stroke prevention between rivaroxaban and dabigatran; however, rivaroxaban was associated with a higher risk of thromboembolic events other than stroke, death, and bleeding.
Source: American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs - September 13, 2016 Category: Cardiology Source Type: research

Cost-effectiveness analysis of dabigatran versus rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation using real-world evidence in elderly US Medicare beneficiaries.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study using US Medicare real-world data, dabigatran was found to dominate rivaroxaban. The analyses were limited by the short follow-up period of the real-world data and results may not be generalizable to other patient populations. PMID: 28862479 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Source: Current Medical Research and Opinion - September 3, 2017 Category: Research Tags: Curr Med Res Opin Source Type: research

Sex-Specific Comparative Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation Original Articles
Conclusions— The reduced risk of ischemic stroke in patients taking rivaroxaban, compared with dabigatran and warfarin, seems to be limited to men, whereas the higher risk of bleeding seems to be limited to women.
Source: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes - April 13, 2017 Category: Cardiology Authors: Palamaner Subash Shantha, G., Bhave, P. D., Girotra, S., Hodgson-Zingman, D., Mazur, A., Giudici, M., Chrischilles, E., Vaughan Sarrazin, M. S. Tags: Anticoagulants, Cerebrovascular Disease/Stroke Original Articles Source Type: research

Medicare beneficiary out-of-pocket spending for stroke prevention in non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: a budget analysis
Healthcare costs today are increasingly being shifted from payers to patients, yet few providers factor patient costs into treatment decisions. Recent advancements in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) have resulted in new treatment options where previously there were few. While the clinical benefit and cost effectiveness of these treatments are supported by a growing body of evidence, the cost impact to patients has not been explored. This analysis sought to quantify patient out-of-pocket costs for three stroke prevention strategies: warfarin, dabigatran and left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with the Watchman Device.
Source: Value in Health - May 1, 2015 Category: Global & Universal Authors: S. Armstrong, S.L. Amorosi, G. Erickson, P. Patel, K. Stein Source Type: research

FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA study of Medicare patients finds risks lower for stroke and death but higher for gastrointestinal bleeding with Pradaxa (dabigatran) compared to warfarin
[05-13-2014] In its ongoing review of the blood thinner Pradaxa (dabigatran), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently completed a new study in Medicare patients comparing Pradaxa to an older blood thinner, warfarin, for risk of ischemic or clot-related stroke, bleeding in the brain, major gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, myocardial infarction (MI), and death.
Source: FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research - What's New - February 26, 2018 Category: Drugs & Pharmacology Source Type: news

Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin, Stratified by Stroke Risk in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
The objective of the study was to examine how the comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin differ across subgroups of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients defined by stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≤3, 4-5, ≥6). Using claims data from a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries, we identified patients newly diagnosed with AF in 2013-2014 who initiated warfarin (n=12,354), apixaban (n=2,358), dabigatran (n=1,415) or rivaroxaban (n=5,139), and categorized them according to their CHA2DS2-VAS c score (≤3, 4-5, ≥6).
Source: The American Journal of Cardiology - March 28, 2018 Category: Cardiology Authors: Inmaculada Hernandez, Yuting Zhang, Samir Saba Source Type: research