Filtered By:
Condition: Stroke
Drug: Pradaxa

This page shows you your search results in order of date. This is page number 14.

Order by Relevance | Date

Total 1527 results found since Jan 2013.

Use of Oral Anticoagulants and Intracranial Hemorrhage Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
To the Editor A recent article suggested that the use of non –vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) within 7 days of intravenous alteplase was not associated with an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage. However, we are concerned that some readers may interpret these results as an endorsement of the use of alteplase in patients with acute st roke who were taking NOACs, irrespective of the time frame of last use. Based on dose-finding studies, the drug half-life is 12 hours for apixaban, 11 to 13 hours for rivaroxaban, 10 to 14 hours for edoxaban, and 12 to 17 hours for dabigatran in patients with normal k...
Source: JAMA - June 21, 2022 Category: General Medicine Source Type: research

Use of Oral Anticoagulants and Intracranial Hemorrhage Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke —Reply
In Reply We agree that conclusions drawn from our observational cohort study should be interpreted within the context of the study design and its inherent limitations. One such limitation is the lack of granular data on the time of last NOAC dose. The GWTG-Stroke registry defines NOAC use as documentation that a patient was taking dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban within 7 days before hospital arrival. We attempted to overcome this limitation by including additional data from the ARAMIS registry.
Source: JAMA - June 21, 2022 Category: General Medicine Source Type: research

Treatment strategy of dabigatran etexilate following the availability of idarucizumab in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: J-Dabigatran Surveillance 2
CONCLUSIONS: Dabigatran continues to be safe and well tolerated in patients with NVAF for stroke and systemic embolism prevention and continues to be prescribed appropriately. Treatment outcomes have not changed since the availability of idarucizumab. Since the J-Dabi1 study, treatment guidelines for anticoagulation use in NVAF have been updated based on emerging clinical evidence, accounting for differences in patient characteristics, and making dabigatran a preference for distinct patient populations.PMID:35717283 | DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.04.007
Source: Journal of Cardiology - June 18, 2022 Category: Cardiology Authors: Takeshi Yamashita Shinichiro Uchiyama Hirotsugu Atarashi Ken Okumura Yukihiro Koretsune Masahiro Yasaka Junichi Wakayama Taku Fukaya Hiroshi Inoue J-Dabigatran Surveillance Investigators Source Type: research

Efficacy and Safety Considerations With Dose-Reduced Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Review
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Dose adjustment and low-intensity treatment are 2 different forms of dose-reduced DOACs. Dose adjustment is mostly relevant for AF and should be done based on the approved criteria. Dose adjustment of DOACs should not be used for acute VTE treatment in most cases. In contrast, low-intensity DOACs may be used for primary or secondary VTE prevention for studied and approved indications. Attention should be given to routine practice patterns to align the daily clinical practice with existing evidence of safety and efficacy.PMID:35648414 | DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2022.1292
Source: Atherosclerosis - June 1, 2022 Category: Cardiology Authors: Behnood Bikdeli Farbod Zahedi Tajrishi Parham Sadeghipour Azita H Talasaz John Fanikos Giuseppe Lippi Deborah M Siegal John W Eikelboom Manuel Monreal David Jimenez Jean M Connors Walter Ageno Geoffrey D Barnes Gregory Piazza Dominick J Angiolillo Sahil A Source Type: research

The use of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in dialysis patients-A systematic review
This study investigated the available evidence for the use of NOACs in dialysis patients. Online databases were systematically searched for eligible studies including pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, cohort studies, and randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing NOAC with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or no anticoagulant treatment. Newcastle Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of bias tool were used for quality assessment. Twenty studies were identified (nine PK studies, two RCTs, and nine cohort studies). Most of the studies investigated apixaban or rivaroxaban. In dialysis patients, less accumulation was reported with apixaban and ...
Source: Seminars in Dialysis - May 27, 2022 Category: Urology & Nephrology Authors: Agitha Chandrasegaram Christian Daugaard Peters Source Type: research

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on England's national prescriptions of oral vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs): An interrupted time series analysis (January 2019 - February 2021)
Conclusion: The overall oral anticoagulants use in this period was lower than expected, indicating a medical needs gap, possibly due to adherence issues. The potential clinical and logistical consequences warrant further study to identify contributing factors and mitigate avoidable risks.PMID:35582854 | DOI:10.1080/03007995.2022.2078100
Source: Current Medical Research and Opinion - May 18, 2022 Category: Research Authors: Sajidah Alkhameys Ravina Barrett Source Type: research

Effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with prior bleeding events: a retrospective analysis of administrative claims databases
ConclusionsIn this real-world analysis of a large sample of NVAF patients with prior bleeding, NOACs were associated with similar or lower risk of stroke/SE and MB vs. warfarin and variable risk of stroke/SE and MB against each other.
Source: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis - May 17, 2022 Category: Hematology Source Type: research

Comparison of Dabigatran Versus Warfarin Treatment for Prevention of New Cerebral Lesions in Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
Warfarin is the standard anticoagulation therapy for valvular atrial fibrillation (AF); however, new oral anticoagulants have emerged as an alternative. We compared the efficacy and safety of dabigatran with conventional treatment in AF associated with left-sided valvular heart disease (VHD), including mitral stenosis (MS). Patients with AF and left-sided VHD were randomly assigned to receive dabigatran or conventional treatment. The primary end point was the occurrence of clinical stroke or a new brain lesion (silent brain infarct and microbleed) on 1-year follow-up brain magnetic resonance imaging.
Source: The American Journal of Cardiology - May 9, 2022 Category: Cardiology Authors: Min Soo Cho, Minsu Kim, Seung-ah Lee, Sahmin Lee, Dae-Hee Kim, Jun Kim, Jong-Min Song, Gi-Byoung Nam, Sang Joon Kim, Duk-Hyun Kang, Kee-Joon Choi Source Type: research

Management of Patients with Embolic Stroke of Unknown Source: Interpreting the Evidence in the Light of Clinical Judgement
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2022 May 7. doi: 10.1007/s11910-022-01202-w. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTPURPOSE OF REVIEW: To assess the validity of the belief that anticoagulation is not beneficial in patients with embolic stroke of unknown source (ESUS), and to asssess the benefits and safety of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs).RECENT FINDINGS: The failure of randomized trials to show benefit of anticoagulation in ESUS is probably due to misclassification of large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) as ESUS, as defined by a stenosis ≥ 50%. There are important differences among DOACs. There are a number of problems with ...
Source: Atherosclerosis - May 7, 2022 Category: Cardiology Authors: J David Spence Source Type: research