Filtered By:
Condition: Thrombosis
Drug: Warfarin
This page shows you your search results in order of date. This is page number 3.
Order by Relevance | Date
Total 1175 results found since Jan 2013.
Reduced dose direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin with high time in therapeutic range in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
The objective of this study was to compare effectiveness and safety between reduced dose DOACs and high TTR warfarin treatment (TTR ≥ 70%) in NVAF. A Swedish anticoagulation registry was used in identifying eligible patients from July 2011 to December 2017. The study cohort consisted of 40,564 patients with newly initiated DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban) (11,083 patients) or warfarin treatment (29,481 patients ) after exclusion of 374,135 patients due to not being warfarin or DOAC naïve, not being prescribed reduced dose, having previous mechanical heart valve (MHV), or being under 18 years old. The me...
Source: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis - January 6, 2023 Category: Hematology Source Type: research
Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with venous thromboembolism and creatinine clearance & lt; 30 mL/min
AbstractThe few studies that compared direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) vs. warfarin in the setting of advanced renal insufficiency have focused on patients with atrial fibrillation. The purpose of this observational, matched, cohort study of patients was to assess the effectiveness and safety of DOAC vs. warfarin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 30 mL/min. This observational, cohort study included patients with VTE and CrCl < 30 mL/min who were newly initiated on a DOAC or warfarin between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020. DOAC pati...
Source: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis - December 23, 2022 Category: Hematology Source Type: research
Clinical profile and risk factors of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) in Sudan: A multicenter cross-sectional study
CONCLUSION: Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis is mainly a disease of child-bearing women, although significant proportions of men were affected. Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis presents in a wide variety of signs and symptoms.PMID:36536723 | PMC:PMC9758368 | DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104891
Source: Annals of Medicine - December 20, 2022 Category: Internal Medicine Authors: Etedal Ahmed A Ibrahim Rofiedah Eisa Hassan Mohamed Khabab Abbasher Hussien Mohamed Ahmed Mazin S Haroun Yassin Abdelrahim Abdalla Mohammed Eltahier Abdalla Omer Mohammed Mahmmoud Fadelallah Eljack Source Type: research
Real-World Study Confirms Benefit of XARELTO ® (rivaroxaban) for Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients
TITUSVILLE, NJ, December 9, 2022 – The Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson today announced observational data from eight years of clinical practice showing that the oral Factor Xa inhibitor XARELTO® (rivaroxaban) is associated with comparable effectiveness and safety to the Factor Xa inhibitor apixaban for the treatment of cancer-associated thromboembolism (CAT) in a broad cohort of patients with various cancer types. Patients with CAT are at a higher risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is the second-leading cause of death in people with cancer.1Data from the Observational Study in Cancer-A...
Source: Johnson and Johnson - December 9, 2022 Category: Pharmaceuticals Tags: Latest News Source Type: news
Can Warfarin be replaced by non-vitamin K anticoagulants in prosthetic valves?
In this report, the authors discussed the published data related to NOACs use in prosthetic valves highlighting the proposed mechanisms of NOACs failure and other controversial data regarding their efficacy and safety in prosthetic valves.EXPERT OPINION: Although NOACs have proven to be even safer and more effective alternatives to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in several indications for anticoagulation, the data regarding their safety and efficacy in prosthetic heart valves is still debatable. The controversial data regarding NOACs use in prosthetic valves renders it difficult to define specific guideline-recommendation fo...
Source: Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy - November 24, 2022 Category: Cardiology Authors: Mahmoud Abdelnabi Juthipong Benjanuwattra Ashraf Ahmed Abdallah Almaghraby Source Type: research
Self-reported adherence to direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin therapy in a specialized thrombosis service —a cross-sectional study of patients in a Canadian Health Region
ConclusionsSelf-reported medication adherence was similar between warfarin and DOACs. Since suboptimal adherence is associated with poor clinical outcomes and increased costs, various stakeholders should emphasize the importance of medication adherence to oral anticoagulants at each patient encounter.
Source: European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology - November 18, 2022 Category: Drugs & Pharmacology Source Type: research
Proportion of Patients on Warfarin Therapy Who Are Eligible for Conversion to a Direct Oral Anticoagulant in the Setting of COVID-19
CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Approximately 52% of patients on warfarin were eligible for DOACs. This presents an opportunity to reduce patient exposure to health care settings and health care utilization in the setting of COVID-19. Increased costs of DOACs need to be assessed.PMID:36373362 | PMC:PMC9663271 | DOI:10.1177/10600280221136874
Source: The Annals of Pharmacotherapy - November 14, 2022 Category: Drugs & Pharmacology Authors: Rachel Hess Elizabeth Renner Erin Mouland Denise Sutter-Long Nghi Ha Source Type: research
Oral anticoagulants: a systematic overview of reviews on efficacy and safety, genotyping, self-monitoring, and stakeholder experiences
ConclusionsFor stroke prevention in AF, direct OACs seem to be more effective and safer than usual care, and apixaban (5 mg twice daily) had the best profile. For VTE, there was no strong evidence that direct OACs were better than usual care. Education and pharmacist management could improve coagulation control. Both clinicians and patients rated efficacy and safety as the most important factors in managing AF and V TE.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42017084263 —one deviation; efficacy and safety were from one review.
Source: Systematic Reviews - October 28, 2022 Category: International Medicine & Public Health Source Type: research
