Disparities between guideline statements on acute and post-acute management of cervical artery dissection

Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 11;23(1):9. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2301009.ABSTRACTEven though cervical artery dissection is one of the main reasons for ischemic stroke in young patients, acute management and post-acute primary or secondary prevention of cerebral ischemia differ significantly in different centers and countries. These discrepancies are reflected by the differences in guideline recommendations of major stroke societies. Our narrative review aims to shed light on the different recommendations in guideline-statements of stroke societies and to give an overview of the current literature concerning acute management and post-acute treatment of cervical artery dissection patients. In general, intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy are recommended, irrespective of stroke etiology, if administered within the label. Secondary prevention of cerebral ischemia can be achieved by antiplatelet intake or anticoagulation, with, to date, neither treatment establishing superiority over the other. Duration of antithrombotic treatment, statin use as well as optimal endovascular approach are still up for debate and need further evaluation. Additionally, it is still unknown, whether the recommendations given in any of the guideline statements are similarly relevant in spontaneous and traumatic cervical artery dissection, as none of the stroke societies differentiates between the two.PMID:35092201 | DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2301009
Source: Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine - Category: Cardiology Authors: Source Type: research