Transcript for Advice from a Master Peer Reviewer

Below is the transcript of the following Academic Medicine Podcast episode: Advice from a Master Peer ReviewerOriginally posted August 2018, Reposted September 6, 2021 Read more about this episode and listen here. Toni Gallo: Hi all. This week I am reposting a discussion I had with Academic Medicine’s former Editor-in-Chief David Sklar, and one of the journal’s Master Reviewers, Carl Stevens. David and I spoke to Carl back in August of 2018 about the practice of evaluating a scholarly article as a peer reviewer. Carl is a longtime reviewer for Academic Medicine and a 10-time winner of our Excellence in Reviewing Award. I hope you all will find Carl’s description of his process for evaluating submissions, including some very practical advice about the logistics of completing a review and what he looks for in a submission, valuable for your own work. Toni Gallo: If you’re looking for other resources to expand your skills as a reviewer, check out academicmedicine.org. Under the Journal Info tab, there’s a For Reviewers link. There, you’ll find reviewer policies and guidelines as well as advice and recommendations from the journal’s other Master Reviewers. There’s even a practice exercise so you can try reviewing a research report manuscript that was submitted to Academic Medicine, and you can compare your review comments with those of the actual reviewers. Toni Gallo: I want to say a quick thank you to our cu...
Source: Academic Medicine Blog - Category: Universities & Medical Training Authors: Tags: AM Podcast Transcript Audio Peer Reviewer Resources medical education scholarly publishing Source Type: blogs