Rating the importance of outcomes from diabetes trials. A survey of patients ’ and doctors’ opinions
ConclusionThe current study suggest that patients and doctors weigh some diabetic outcomes used as part of composite endpoints in clinical diabetes trials differently. These findings call for more studies on patient reported outcomes and patient education for improved personal care.Highlights• We performed this study to assess how patients and practicing physicians rate the importance of outcomes commonly used in diabetes trials.• We found that patients and doctors rate the importance of some outcomes used in clinical diabetes trials differently.• These findings suggest that shared decision making is pivotal when taking clinical decisions and that future diabetes studies incorporate end points relevant to both patients and clinicians and do not combine end points which are not equally important.
Source: Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders - Category: Endocrinology Source Type: research
More News: Angioplasty | Cardiology | Coronary Angioplasty | Diabetes | Diabetes Mellitus | Diabetic Ulcers | Education | Endocrinology | Heart | Heart Attack | Heart Failure | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention | Stroke | Study | Universities & Medical Training