Accuracy of energy and nutrient intake estimation versus observed intake using four technology-assisted dietary assessment methods: a randomized crossover feeding study
CONCLUSIONS: Under controlled conditions, Intake24, ASA24, and mFR-TA estimated average energy and nutrient intakes with reasonable validity, but intake distributions were estimated accurately by Intake24 only (energy and protein). This study may inform considerations regarding instruments of choice in future population surveillance.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number ACTRN12621000209897; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=381165&isReview=true.PMID:38710447 | DOI:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.04.030
Source: Am J Clin Nutr - Category: Nutrition Authors: Clare Whitton Clare E Collins Barbara A Mullan Megan E Rollo Satvinder S Dhaliwal Richard Norman Carol J Boushey Edward J Delp Fengqing Zhu Tracy A McCaffrey Sharon I Kirkpatrick Christina M Pollard Janelle D Healy Amira Hassan Shivangi Garg Paul Atyeo Sy Source Type: research
More News: Australia Health | Clinical Trials | Diets | New Zealand Health | Nutrition | Statistics | Study | Women