More Early Stage Investigators Supported in FY 2022

Discussion and Funding Rates for PIs on Type 1 R01-Equivalent Applications and Awards in FY 2022 by Career Stage Career StageApplicantsDiscussedAwardeesDiscussion Rate (%)*Funding Rate (%)Early Stage54353466160963.829.6New, Not Early72413750125751.817.4At Risk77364570208759.127.0Established110457847359871.032.6 * The Discussion Rate is a person-based metric that is the percent of applicants (actually people designated as PI’s on an application) who had at least one application make it to the discussion stage of peer review. The next set of tables present aggregate data for sex/gender (Table 3), race (Table 4), ethnicity (Table 5), and disability status (Table 6). The researchers voluntarily self-reported this demographic information on their eRA profiles. Please keep the following in mind: We use the White House’s Office of Management and Budget Minimum Standards for collecting and reporting race and ethnicity data (see also this Nexus article for more). These demographic data are used for statistical purposes only and not linked to consideration of funding of individual grant applications. Applications are received from, and awards are issued to institutions, not individual scientists. Institutions designate scientists who serve as principal investigators on applications and awards. Thus, when we say that an application was received from a male researcher, what is meant is that an application was received from an institution who designated a male r...
Source: NIH Extramural Nexus - Category: Research Authors: Tags: blog Open Mike ESI Funding data NGRI Source Type: funding