Evaluation of primary care physicians’ approaches to hemophilia and bleeding disorders: a questionnaire survey

This study aimed to determine and compare the approach of primary care physicians (including general practitioners) and emergency physicians with a questionnaire including simulation-based cases on hemophilia. This simulation and two-stage questionnaire study was conducted with 244 participants. Before–after questionnaires, two case simulations, a brief presentation, and statistical analysis were performed. Participants mostly preferred tests, such as prothrombin time (PT) or partial thromboplastin time (PTT) to bleeding time for primary hemostasis (PT/PTT n: 192, 84.2%, bleeding time n: 94, 41.2%). Similar results were found for secondary hemostasis (bleeding time n: 144, 63.4%). There was a lack of knowledge in the management of simulation-based cases of acute hemorrhagic complications and factor product preparation (complication case: correct n: 100, 55.2%; initial doses correct n: 56, 43.4%, factor preparing correct n: 37, 49.3%, factor admission correct n: 36, 24.3%). All changed significantly, after the presentation (P = 0.000). Our study shows that there is probably a lack of knowledge of diagnostic investigations and appropriate factor product preparation with possible consequences for patients and economics.
Source: Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis - Category: Hematology Tags: ORIGINAL ARTICLES Source Type: research