• Filter By:
• Specialty
• Source
• Condition
• Cancer
• Infectious Disease
• Drug
• Training
• Management
• Procedure
• Therapy
• Vaccine
• Nutrition
• Country

Non-persistence to Oral Anticoagulation Treatment in Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation in the USA
ConclusionIn over one million patients with NVAF, our results suggest differences in anticoagulation treatment persistence across OAC agents, even after accounting for clinical events after OAC initiation. It is important for clinicians and patients to take these differences into consideration, especially as non-persistence to OAC therapy is associated with thromboembolic complications.
Source: American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs - October 21, 2021 Category: Cardiology Source Type: research

Real-World Direct Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin in Medicare Beneficiaries with Atrial Fibrillation
It remains unknown whether the comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin differs between atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with and without a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Using 2012-2014 Medicare claims data, we identified patients newly diagnosed with AF in 2013-2014 who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban or warfarin. We categorized patients based on a history of stroke or TIA. We constructed Cox proportional hazard models that included indicator variables for treatment groups, a history of stroke or TIA, and the interaction between them, and controlled ...
Source: The American Journal of Cardiology - April 9, 2020 Category: Cardiology Authors: Lanting Yang, Maria M. Brooks, Nancy W. Glynn, Yuting Zhang, Samir Saba, Inmaculada Hernandez Source Type: research

Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients: The dose subgroup analysis of the ARISTOPHANES study
ConclusionsIn this large observational study, api was the only NOAC associated with lower rates of S/SE and MB for both doses compared to warf. Dose selection criteria cannot be ascertained from current data sources. Future studies of pts who were appropriately dosed should be warranted.
Source: Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements - December 25, 2018 Category: Cardiology Source Type: research

Outcomes Associated with Apixaban Use in End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in the United States.
Conclusions -Among ESKD patients with AF on dialysis, apixaban use may be associated with lower risk of major bleeding compared with warfarin, with a standard 5 mg twice a day dose also associated with reductions in thromboembolic and mortality risk. PMID: 29954737 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Source: Circulation - June 28, 2018 Category: Cardiology Authors: Siontis KC, Zhang X, Eckard A, Bhave N, Schaubel DE, He K, Tilea A, Stack AG, Balkrishnan R, Yao X, Noseworthy PA, Shah ND, Saran R, Nallamothu BK Tags: Circulation Source Type: research

Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin, Stratified by Stroke Risk in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
The objective of the study was to examine how the comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin differ across subgroups of patients with atrial fibrillation defined by stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≤3, 4 to 5, ≥6). Using Medicare claims data, we identified patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation in 2013 to 2014 who initiated warfarin (n=12,354), apixaban (n=2,358), dabigatran (n=1,415), or rivaroxaban (n=5,139), and categorized them according to their CHA2DS2-VASc score (≤3, 4 to 5, ≥6).
Source: The American Journal of Cardiology - March 28, 2018 Category: Cardiology Authors: Inmaculada Hernandez, Yuting Zhang, Samir Saba Source Type: research

Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin, Stratified by Stroke Risk in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
The objective of the study was to examine how the comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin differ across subgroups of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients defined by stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≤3, 4-5, ≥6). Using claims data from a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries, we identified patients newly diagnosed with AF in 2013-2014 who initiated warfarin (n=12,354), apixaban (n=2,358), dabigatran (n=1,415) or rivaroxaban (n=5,139), and categorized them according to their CHA2DS2-VAS c score (≤3, 4-5, ≥6).
Source: The American Journal of Cardiology - March 28, 2018 Category: Cardiology Authors: Inmaculada Hernandez, Yuting Zhang, Samir Saba Source Type: research

Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation
No studies have performed direct pairwise comparisons of the effectiveness and safety of warfarin and the new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban in atrial fibrillation (AF). Using 2013-2014 claims from a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries, we identified patients newly diagnosed with AF who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, warfarin or no oral anticoagulation therapy in 2013-2014. Outcomes included the composite of ischemic stroke, systemic embolism (SE) and death, any bleeding event, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and treatment persistence.
Source: The American Journal of Cardiology - August 8, 2017 Category: Cardiology Authors: Inmaculada Hernandez, Yuting Zhang, Samir Saba Source Type: research

Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin in Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation
No studies have performed direct pairwise comparisons of the effectiveness and safety of warfarin and the new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban. Using 2013 to 2014 claims from a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries, we identified patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, warfarin, or no oral anticoagulation therapy in 2013 to 2014. Outcomes included the composite of ischemic stroke, systemic embolism (SE) and death, any bleeding event, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and treatment persistence.
Source: The American Journal of Cardiology - August 8, 2017 Category: Cardiology Authors: Inmaculada Hernandez, Yuting Zhang, Samir Saba Source Type: research

Sex-Specific Comparative Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation Original Articles
Conclusions— The reduced risk of ischemic stroke in patients taking rivaroxaban, compared with dabigatran and warfarin, seems to be limited to men, whereas the higher risk of bleeding seems to be limited to women.
Source: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes - April 13, 2017 Category: Cardiology Authors: Palamaner Subash Shantha, G., Bhave, P. D., Girotra, S., Hodgson-Zingman, D., Mazur, A., Giudici, M., Chrischilles, E., Vaughan Sarrazin, M. S. Tags: Anticoagulants, Cerebrovascular Disease/Stroke Original Articles Source Type: research

Comparing Stroke and Bleeding with Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran in Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of the US Medicare Part D Data
ConclusionsThere was no difference in stroke prevention between rivaroxaban and dabigatran; however, rivaroxaban was associated with a higher risk of thromboembolic events other than stroke, death, and bleeding.
Source: American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs - September 13, 2016 Category: Cardiology Source Type: research

Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Health Services and Outcomes Research
Conclusions In patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, apixaban was associated with lower risks of both stroke and major bleeding, dabigatran was associated with similar risk of stroke but lower risk of major bleeding, and rivaroxaban was associated with similar risks of both stroke and major bleeding in comparison to warfarin.
Source: JAHA:Journal of the American Heart Association - June 12, 2016 Category: Cardiology Authors: Yao, X., Abraham, N. S., Sangaralingham, L. R., Bellolio, M. F., McBane, R. D., Shah, N. D., Noseworthy, P. A. Tags: Atrial Fibrillation, Secondary Prevention, Anticoagulants, Transplantation, Cerebrovascular Disease/Stroke Health Services and Outcomes Research Source Type: research

Cost-Effectiveness of Dabigatran (150 mg Twice Daily) and Warfarin in Patients ≥65 Years With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
Dabigatran has been shown to be superior to warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) but with higher out-of-pocket costs for patients. Although dabigatran has been shown to be cost effective from a societal perspective, cost implications for individual patients and insurers are not well described. We aimed to assess cost perspectives of each payer (Medicare and patient) in relation to administration, monitoring, and adverse outcomes for dabigatran and warfarin in patients with and without prescription drug coverage.
Source: The American Journal of Cardiology - October 16, 2015 Category: Cardiology Authors: Brian M. Salata, David W. Hutton, Deborah A. Levine, James B. Froehlich, Geoffrey D. Barnes Tags: Arrhythmias and Conduction Disturbances Source Type: research

Cost-Effectiveness of Dabigatran (150 mg Twice Daily) and Warfarin in Patients ≥ 65 Years with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
Dabigatran has been shown to be superior to warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) but with higher out-of-pocket costs for patients. Although dabigatran has been shown to be cost-effective from a societal perspective, cost implications for individual patients and insurers are not well-described. We aimed to assess cost perspectives of each payer (Medicare and patient) in relation to administration, monitoring and adverse outcomes for dabigatran and warfarin in patients with and without prescription drug coverage.
Source: The American Journal of Cardiology - October 16, 2015 Category: Cardiology Authors: Brian M. Salata, David W. Hutton, Deborah A. Levine, James B. Froehlich, Geoffrey D. Barnes Source Type: research

Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran and Warfarin in Real-World US Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study Health Services and Outcomes Research
Conclusions Dabigatran could be a safe and potentially more effective alternative to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation managed in routine practice settings.
Source: JAHA:Journal of the American Heart Association - April 10, 2015 Category: Cardiology Authors: Lauffenburger, J. C., Farley, J. F., Gehi, A. K., Rhoney, D. H., Brookhart, M. A., Fang, G. Tags: Health Services and Outcomes Research Source Type: research

Cardiovascular, Bleeding, and Mortality Risks in Elderly Medicare Patients Treated with Dabigatran or Warfarin for Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.
CONCLUSIONS: -In general practice settings, dabigatran was associated with reduced risk of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and death, and increased risk of major gastrointestinal hemorrhage compared with warfarin in elderly patients with non-valvular AF. These associations were most pronounced in patients treated with dabigatran 150 mg twice daily, whereas the association of 75 mg twice daily with study outcomes was indistinguishable from warfarin except for a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage with dabigatran. PMID: 25359164 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Source: Circulation - October 30, 2014 Category: Cardiology Authors: Graham DJ, Reichman ME, Wernecke M, Zhang R, Southworth MR, Levenson M, Sheu TC, Mott K, Goulding MR, Houstoun M, MaCurdy TE, Worrall C, Kelman JA Tags: Circulation Source Type: research

Pages: 1  2