Asthma guidelines: comparison of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Expert Panel Report 4 with Global Initiative for Asthma 2021

Purpose of review Asthma continues to be a prevalent respiratory disease that affects lives within the United States and worldwide. Clinical asthma guidelines based on scientific evidence on testing and therapeutic interventions are needed to control this disease better. To meet this need, the NAEPP (National Asthma Education and Prevention Program) and GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) were formed to assist with best practice diagnosis and treatments for asthma. This paper reviews the subtle differences and similarities between the most recent recommendations put forth by NAEPP 2020 and GINA 2021, mainly examining the six selected topics, as well as methodology, guidance on emerging topics, and implementation. Recent findings In December 2020, the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Coordinating Committee released their focused update on fraction of exhaled nitric oxide, indoor allergen mitigation, inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting muscarinic antagonists, allergen immunotherapy, and bronchial thermoplasty. The Global Initiative for Asthma comprehensive document is published annually as a framework for all nations. Therefore, it is timely to consider the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Coordinating Committee 2020 in relation to the GINA 2021. Summary The comparison provides a better understanding of evidence-based recommendations for asthma. The NAEPP 2020 and GINA 2021 will equip providers with the knowledge to provide the...
Source: Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine - Category: Respiratory Medicine Tags: ASTHMA: Edited by Jonathan A. Bernstein Source Type: research