Current Trends and Predictors of Case Outcomes for Malpractice in Colonoscopy in the United States
Conclusions:
Malpractice related to colonoscopy remains a significant and has geographic variability. Errors related to sedation predicted plaintiff verdict and may represent a target to reduce litigation. Primary care physicians and surgeons were frequently cited codefendants, underscoring the significance of interdisciplinary care for colonoscopy.
Source: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology - Category: Gastroenterology Tags: Alimentary Tract: Original Article Source Type: research
More News: Colonoscopy | Databases & Libraries | Gastroenterology | Legislation | Malpractice | Primary Care | Study | USA Health