Tooth-coloured materials for class II restorations in primary molars: systematic review and meta-analysis

ConclusionCR, RMGI and CO presented no statistical differences. In comparison to other tooth-coloured materials, studies on GI were too few to allow recommendations about its use. More studies on HGVI are needed for evidence-based recommendations to be made. The evidence extracted from this meta-analysis was not strong enough (moderate), due to the small number of RCTs and the risk of bias ranging from high to moderate. More, well-designed RCTs comparing tooth-coloured materials for primary molar Class II restorations are necessary.
Source: European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry - Category: Dentistry Source Type: research