“Vicarious thinking” was a key driver of score change in Delphi surveys for COS development and is facilitated by feedback of results

The objectives of this nested study were to (1) assess whether changes in scores between rounds altered the final degree of consensus achieved in three Delphi surveys conducted as part of COS development projects (anal, gastric and prostate cancer), and (2) explore participants ’ reasons for changing scores between rounds

Source: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology - September 29, 2020 Category: Epidemiology Authors: Rebecca Fish, Steven MacLennan, Bilal Alkhaffaf, Paula R. Williamson Tags: Original Article Source Type: research