Models and Impacts of Science Research Experiences: A Review of the Literature of CUREs, UREs, and TREs.

Models and Impacts of Science Research Experiences: A Review of the Literature of CUREs, UREs, and TREs. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Dec;18(4):ar65 Authors: Krim JS, Coté LE, Schwartz RS, Stone EM, Cleeves JJ, Barry KJ, Burgess W, Buxner SR, Gerton JM, Horvath L, Keller JM, Lee SC, Locke SM, Rebar BM Abstract In efforts to increase scientific literacy and enhance the preparation of learners to pursue careers in science, there are growing opportunities for students and teachers to engage in scientific research experiences, including course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs), undergraduate research experiences (UREs), and teacher research experiences (TREs). Prior literature reviews detail a variety of models, benefits, and challenges and call for the continued examination of program elements and associated impacts. This paper reports a comprehensive review of 307 papers published between 2007 and 2017 that include CURE, URE, and TRE programs, with a special focus on research experiences for K-12 teachers. A research-supported conceptual model of science research experiences was used to develop a coding scheme, including participant demographics, theoretical frameworks, methodology, and reported outcomes. We summarize recent reports on program impacts and identify gaps or misalignments between goals and measured outcomes. The field of biology was the predominant scientific disciplinary focus. Findings suggest a lack of...
Source: CBE Life Sciences Education - Category: Cytology Authors: Tags: CBE Life Sci Educ Source Type: research