Cost-effectiveness analysis of chimney/snorkel versus fenestrated endovascular repair for high-risk patients with complex abdominal aortic pathologies.
CONCLUSIONS: Ch-EVAR is significantly more cost-effective compared to f-EVAR. The two procedures have comparable readmission rates for reinterventions.
PMID: 31640319 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Source: The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery - Category: Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery Authors: Taneva GT, Donas KP, Pitoulias GA, Austermann M, Veith FJ, Torsello G Tags: J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) Source Type: research
More News: Cardiology | Cardiovascular | Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery | Endovascular Repair (EVAR) | Gastroschisis Repair | Heart | Study