Rate versus rhythm control for management of atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: Results from the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) registry

Conclusions: In this outpatient registry of US clinical practice, the majority of patients with AF were managed with rate control alone. Patients with more symptoms and who were treated by an electrophysiologist were more likely to receive rhythm-control therapies. A significant proportion of AF patients, regardless of treatment strategy, were not treated with anticoagulation for thromboembolism prophylaxis.

Source: American Heart Journal - February 22, 2013 Category: Cardiology Authors: Benjamin A. Steinberg, DaJuanicia N. Holmes, Michael D. Ezekowitz, Gregg C. Fonarow, Peter R. Kowey, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Gerald Naccarelli, James Reiffel, Paul Chang, Eric D. Peterson, Jonathan P. Piccini Tags: Electrophysiology Source Type: research