Neurocentrism and Name-Calling: Let ’s Agree to Agree. Reply to Satel & amp; Lilienfeld

AbstractAlthough these authors sometimes resort to medical terminology, we strongly agree that addiction is not a disease and that the Brain Disease Model of Addiction (BDMA) captures only one part of the story and distorts the big picture. Yet Satel and Lilienfeld continue to conflate a neurobiological model (such as mine) with a disease model. They also complain that my modeling of addiction reveals a hidden “neurocentric” bias, despite my integration of multiple levels of analysis, exactly as they recommend.
Source: Neuroethics - Category: Medical Ethics Source Type: research