Impact of different sterilisation techniques on sorption and NER formation of test chemicals in soil

In this study, experiments in accordance with OECD 307 and OECD 106 guidelines were performed with two soils covering wide range of soil characteristics and treated with the three sterilisation techniques autoclaving, gamma(γ)-radiation and adding 1% (w/w) sodium azide. As a test item, 14C-labelled phenanthrene and bromoxynil was used for OECD 307 test, whereas non-labelled phenanthrene and atrazine was used for OECD 106. The sterilisation efficiencies were investigated using traditional viable plate count and molecular approaches (RNA extraction method). The results suggest that none of the tested techniques resulted in completely sterilised soil with autoclaving being the most efficient technique. Adding sodium azide led to most inefficient sterilisation and a significant increase (0.56 units) in soil pH. OECD 307 results showed differences in NER formation of the test chemicals, especially for soil poisoning and γ-radiation, which could be due to inefficient sterilisation and/or change in soil physico-chemical properties. OECD 106 results suggest that none of the sterilisation techniques considerably affected sorption behaviour of the test chemicals. Based on our results, we recommend autoclaving as most suitable sterilisation technique.PMID:38582162 | DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141915
Source: Chemosphere - Category: Chemistry Authors: Source Type: research