A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of results from REDUCE and RESPECT-two randomized trials on patent foramen ovale closure devices to prevent recurrent cryptogenic stroke
CONCLUSIONS: This MAIC analysis found no statistically significant differences in efficacy and safety outcomes between PFO closure with the HELEX and CARDIOFORM Septal Occluders versus the Amplatzer PFO Occluder, as used in the REDUCE and RESPECT trials.PMID:38373018 | DOI:10.1080/13696998.2024.2320604
Source: Journal of Medical Economics - Category: Health Management Authors: Scott E Kasner Lars Sondergaard Mitesh Nakum Melissa Gomez Montero Mahmoud Hashim Erik J Landaas Source Type: research
More News: Atrial Fibrillation | Cardiology | Clinical Trials | Economics | Health Management | Heart | Ischemic Stroke | Patent Foramen Ovale | Statistics | Stroke | Study