Repost from Saturday Oct 14: The Queen gets it right with a better image

This is a case I posted Saturday, October 14.This ECG was texted to me after the fact with no information. What do you think?This is the ECG that I used for the post.  It is high quality screenshot of a pdf:I had said that the Queen said this is Not OMI with low confidenceHowever, the image that had been texted to me and submitted to the Queen was not this one above.  It was this one below: (photo of computer screen, lower quality):This is the image for which the Queen interpreted " Not OMI with Low Confidence "After posting, I wanted to getexplainability for the ECG, and I was unable to get the explainability from the submission made by the person who sent me the ECG.I needed to submit it myself.So I submitted the high quality ECG again (the one at the top of this post), and this is what I got:Notice (upper left) now she says " OMI - High Confidence " !!Thus, although you can take a photo of any ECG and upload to the Queen, the quality of your photo and the exact screenshot you take of it can make a difference.PM Cardio is working on improving this.But for the time being, the better the image, the more reliable the diagnosis.The good news is this:With the bad image, the Queen did not detect the acute LAD OMI.With the good image, she got it with HIGH confidence.===================================MY Comment, by KEN GRAUER, MD (10/17/2023):===================================QOH (Queen Of Hearts)  — is an amazing AI application. Her ability t...
Source: Dr. Smith's ECG Blog - Category: Cardiology Authors: Source Type: blogs