Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

This study assessed whether other machine learning (ML) models can predict DCI after SAH more accurately than conventional LR. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies directly comparing LR and other ML algorithms to forecast DCI in patients with SAH. Our main outcome was the accuracy measurement, represented by sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic. In the six studies included, comprising 1828 patients, about 28% (519) developed DCI. For LR models, the pooled sensitivity was 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57 –0.84;p <  0.01) and the pooled specificity was 0.63 (95% CI 0.42–0.85;p <  0.01). For ML models, the pooled sensitivity was 0.74 (95% CI 0.61–0.86;p <  0.01) and the pooled specificity was 0.78 (95% CI 0.71–0.86;p = 0.02). Our results suggest that ML algorithms performed better than conventional LR at predicting DCI.Trial Registration: PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) CRD42023441586;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=441586
Source: Neurocritical Care - Category: Neurology Source Type: research