Hemostatic spray (TC-325) vs. standard endoscopic therapy for non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Conclusions Our analysis shows that for acute NV GIB, including oozing/spurting hemorrhage, TC-325 does not result in higher rates of primary hemostasis compared to SET. However, lower rates of failures were seen with TC-325 than SET. In addition, there was no difference in the two modalities when comparing rates of rebleeding and LOS. [...] Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, GermanyArticle in Thieme eJournals: Table of contents | Abstract | open access Full text
Source: Endoscopy International Open - Category: Gastroenterology Authors: Deliwala, Smit S. Chandan, Saurabh Mohan, Babu P. Khan, Shahab Reddy, Nitin Ramai, Daryl Bapaye, Jay A. Dahiya, Dushyant Singh Kassab, Lena L. Facciorusso, Antonio Chawla, Saurabh Adler, Douglas Tags: Review Source Type: research
More News: Angiography | Bleeding | Cancer & Oncology | Databases & Libraries | Endoscopy | Gastroenterology | Lower Endoscopy | Peptic Ulcer | Statistics | Study