Open science in suicide research is open for business.

Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, Vol 43(5), 2022, 355-360; doi:10.1027/0227-5910/a000859In this editorial, the authors use examples from their and others’ work to demonstrate the opportunities for future-proofing research by implementing open science practices, and we discuss some of the challenges and their potential solutions. The authors cover implementing open science practices in new, ongoing, and concluded studies, and discuss practices in order of being “low” to “high” threshold to implement (based on Kathawalla et al., 2021). Space constraints preclude them from covering all open science practices and there are undoubtedly more researchers using open science practices in suicide research than they are aware of and whose work they have included here. To highlight the open science work of as many researchers as possible, the authors have sometimes provided examples in Electronic Supplementary Material 1 (ESM 1) rather than in the text. They hope readers will help us add to these examples via their “living” reading list (https://osf.io/v6y3t/). Readers interested in a broad overview of open science practices are directed to the work of Carpenter and Law (2021), Kathawalla et al. (2021), and Tackett et al. (2019). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
Source: Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention - Category: Psychiatry & Psychology Source Type: research