Blood Donation Screening of Transfusion-Transmissible Viral Infection Using Two Different Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) Platforms: A Single Tertiary Care Oncology Centre Experience

In this study, we describe our experience in screening viral TTIs using two formats of NAT: cobas ® MPX2 polymerase chain reaction- based minipool NAT (PCR MP-NAT) and Procleix Utrio Plus transcription-mediated amplificationbased individual donor-NAT (TMA ID-NAT). Data routinely collected as a part of blood bank operations were retrospectively analysed over a period of 70 months for TTIs. Bloo d samples were initially screened for HIV, HBV, HCV, syphillis by chemiluminescence and malaria by Rapid card test. In addition to serological testing, all samples were further screened by TMA-based ID-NAT (ProcleixUltrio Plus Assay) during Jan 2015–Dec 2016, and by PCR-based MP-NAT (Cobas® TaqSc reen MPX2) during Jan 2017–Oct 2020. RESULTS: A total of 48,151 donations were processed over 70 months, of which 16,212 donations were screened by ProcleixUtrio Plus TMA ID-NAT and 31,939 donations by cobas® MPX2 PCR MP-NAT. Replacement donors and male donors outnumbered voluntary donors and fe male donors respectively. The overall NAT yield rate of MP-NAT was 1:2281 compared to 1:3242 with ID-NAT, during the respective time period. ID-NAT detected 5 HBV infections missed by serology, whereas MP-NAT detected 13 HBV infections and 1 HCV infection missed by serology. The proportion of donati ons that were both seroreactive and NAT reactive was higher with MP-NAT (59.8%) compared to ID-NAT (34.6%). Cobas® MPX2MP-NAT had higher overall NAT yield rate compared to ProcleixUtrio Plus ID-NAT...
Source: Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion - Category: Hematology Source Type: research