• Filter By:
• Specialty
• Source
• Condition
• Cancer
• Infectious Disease
• Drug
• Training
• Management
• Procedure
• Therapy
• Vaccine
• Nutrition
• Country

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for adults with early (stage 1 to 3) non-diabetic chronic kidney disease
CONCLUSIONS: There is currently insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of ACEi or ARB in patients with stage 1 to 3 CKD who do not have DM. The available evidence is overall of very low certainty and high risk of bias. We have identified an area of large uncertainty for a group of patients who account for most of those diagnosed as having CKD.PMID:37466151 | DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD007751.pub3
Source: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews - July 19, 2023 Category: General Medicine Authors: Tess E Cooper Claris Teng David J Tunnicliffe Brydee A Cashmore Giovanni Fm Strippoli Source Type: research

Comparison Between Fimasartan Versus Other Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Patients With Heart Failure After Acute Myocardial Infarction
CONCLUSION: In this nationwide cohort, fimasartan, compared with other ARBs, had comparable treatment effects for a composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, hospitalization for heart failure, and stroke in patients with heart failure after MI.PMID:37365730 | PMC:PMC10293657 | DOI:10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e202
Source: J Korean Med Sci - June 27, 2023 Category: General Medicine Authors: Jihoon Kim Danbee Kang Sung Eun Kim Hyejeong Park Taek Kyu Park Joo Myung Lee Jeong Hoon Yang Young Bin Song Jin-Ho Choi Seung-Hyuk Choi Hyeon-Cheol Gwon Eliseo Guallar Juhee Cho Joo-Yong Hahn Source Type: research

Comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-receptor blockers for preventing macrovascular disease in patients with diabetes: a population-based cohort study.
We examined each outcome individually in secondary analyses, in addition to all-cause mortality. RESULTS:We identified 54 186 patients with diabetes who started taking an angiotensinreceptor blocker during the study period. After multivariable adjustment, patients who took either telmisartan (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.97) or valsartan (adjusted HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.95) had a lower risk of the composite outcome compared with patients who took irbesartan. In contrast, no significant difference in risk was seen between other angiotensin-receptor blockers and irbesartan. In secondar...
Source: cmaj - July 8, 2013 Category: Journals (General) Authors: Antoniou T, Camacho X, Yao Z, Gomes T, Juurlink DN, Mamdani MM Tags: CMAJ Source Type: research