Filtered By:
Condition: Bleeding
Management: Insurance

This page shows you your search results in order of relevance. This is page number 6.

Order by Relevance | Date

Total 143 results found since Jan 2013.

Practical challenges in the conduct of pragmatic trials embedded in health plans: Lessons of IMPACT-AFib, an FDA-Catalyst trial.
Abstract IMPACT-AFib was an 80,000-patient randomized clinical trial implemented by five US insurance companies (health plans) aimed at increasing the use of oral anticoagulants by individuals with atrial fibrillation who were at high risk of stroke and not on treatment. The underlying thesis was that patients could be change agents to initiate prescribing discussions with their providers. We tested the effect of mailing information to both patients and their providers. We used administrative medical claims and pharmacy dispensing data to identify eligible patients, to randomize them to an early or delayed interve...
Source: Clinical Trials - June 25, 2020 Category: Research Authors: Garcia CJ, Haynes K, Pokorney SD, Lin ND, McMahill-Walraven C, Nair V, Parlett L, Martin D, Al-Khalidi HR, McCall D, Granger CB, Platt R, Cocoros NM Tags: Clin Trials Source Type: research

Effectiveness and Safety of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Asian Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Disease.
CONCLUSIONS: NOACs had a comparable risk of ischemic stroke and bleeding in patients with AF and VHD, and reduced the risk of venous thromboembolism, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality, compared to warfarin. Therefore, NOAC is an effective and safe alternative to warfarin in these patients. PMID: 33538623 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Source: Current Medical Research and Opinion - February 6, 2021 Category: Research Tags: Curr Med Res Opin Source Type: research

Continuation or discontinuation of oral anticoagulants after HAS-BLED scores increase in patients with atrial fibrillation
ConclusionsFor patients whose HAS-BLED scores increased to  ≥ 3, the continuation of OACs was associated with better clinical outcomes. An increased HAS-BLED score in anticoagulated AF patients may not be the only reason to withhold OACs, but reminds physicians to correct modifiable bleeding risk factors and follow up patients more closely.Graphical abstractAssociations between Continuation or Discontinuation of Oral Anticoagulants and Risks of Clinical Outcomes after HAS-BLED Scores IncreasedAF atrial fibrillation;aHR adjusted hazard ratio;ICH intra-cranial hemorrhage;OACs oral anticoagulants
Source: Clinical Research in Cardiology - March 11, 2021 Category: Cardiology Source Type: research

Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in Taiwanese patients with end-stage renal disease and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A real-world nationwide cohort study
ConclusionsIn Taiwanese patients with end-stage renal disease and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban may be associated with a similar risk of major bleeding but a lower risk of thromboembolism compared with warfarin. The potential benefit of 10 mg of rivaroxaban in this population requires further investigation.
Source: PLoS One - April 8, 2021 Category: Biomedical Science Authors: Yi-Cheng Lin Source Type: research

Continuation or discontinuation of oral anticoagulants after HAS-BLED scores increase in patients with atrial fibrillation
ConclusionsFor patients whose HAS-BLED scores increased to  ≥ 3, the continuation of OACs was associated with better clinical outcomes. An increased HAS-BLED score in anticoagulated AF patients may not be the only reason to withhold OACs, but reminds physicians to correct modifiable bleeding risk factors and follow up patients more closely.Graphical abstractAssociations between Continuation or Discontinuation of Oral Anticoagulants and Risks of Clinical Outcomes after HAS-BLED Scores IncreasedAF atrial fibrillation;aHR adjusted hazard ratio;ICH intra-cranial hemorrhage;OACs oral anticoagulants
Source: Clinical Research in Cardiology - January 1, 2022 Category: Cardiology Source Type: research

Partial upper sternotomy for aortic valve replacement provides similar mid-term outcomes as the full sternotomy
CONCLUSIONS: Upper partial sternotomy can be performed safely for aortic valve replacement, without increased risk of death, stroke or re-admission in 3 years postoperatively.PMID:35572904 | PMC:PMC9096275 | DOI:10.21037/jtd-21-1494
Source: Journal of Thoracic Disease - May 16, 2022 Category: Respiratory Medicine Authors: Jan Hlavicka David Janda Petr Budera Petr Tousek Marek Maly Richard Fojt Hana Linkova Tomas Holubec Petr Kacer Source Type: research