• Filter By:
• Specialty
• Source
• Condition
• Cancer
• Infectious Disease
• Drug
• Training
• Management
• Procedure
• Therapy
• Vaccine
• Nutrition
• Country

Contemporary Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapies for Secondary Stroke Prevention: A Narrative Review of Current Literature and Guidelines
AbstractPurpose of ReviewStroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. The annual incidence of new or recurrent stroke is approximately 795,000 cases per year in the United States, of which 87% are ischemic in nature. In addition to the management of modifiable high-risk factors to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke, antithrombotic agents (antiplatelets and anticoagulants) play an important role in secondary stroke prevention. This review will discuss the published literature on the use of antiplatelets and anticoagulants in secondary prevention of acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA), ...
Source: Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports - April 11, 2023 Category: Neuroscience Source Type: research

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety Between Apixaban, Dabigatran, Edoxaban, and Rivaroxaban Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation : A Multinational Population-Based Cohort Study
CONCLUSION: Among patients with AF, apixaban use was associated with lower risk for GIB and similar rates of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, ICH, and all-cause mortality compared with dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. This finding was consistent for patients aged 80 years or older and those with chronic kidney disease, who are often underrepresented in clinical trials.PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.PMID:36315950 | DOI:10.7326/M22-0511
Source: Annals of Internal Medicine - October 31, 2022 Category: Internal Medicine Authors: Wallis C Y Lau Carmen Olga Torre Kenneth K C Man Henry Morgan Stewart Sarah Seager Mui Van Zandt Christian Reich Jing Li Jack Brewster Gregory Y H Lip Aroon D Hingorani Li Wei Ian C K Wong Source Type: research

Comparison of Dabigatran Versus Warfarin Treatment for the Prevention of New Cerebral Lesions in Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial fibrillation is one of the most common arrhythmias in the United States and is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events.1 The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Rhythm Society guidelines recommend oral anticoagulation with either warfarin or oral non-vitamin K antagonists for patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation with a high risk for ischemic stroke based on the CHA2DS2-VASc score.2 The recently published article “Comparison of Dabigatran Versus Warfarin Treatment for Prevention of New Cerebral Lesions in Valvular Atrial Fibrillation” discussed the efficacy of...
Source: The American Journal of Cardiology - October 7, 2022 Category: Cardiology Authors: Marwa S.H. Abrahim, Olufemi Sofola-James, Zeina Bani Hani Source Type: research

Can I use DOAC in a patient with renal disease?
Case A 76-year-old man is diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. His comorbid conditions are hypertension, diabetes complicated by neuropathy, and chronic kidney disease stage 3. His current medications include metformin, lisinopril, gabapentin, and aspirin. His most recent laboratories showed a creatinine 1.8, creatinine clearance (CrCl) 35 mL/min, hemoglobin 11g/dL, and international normalized ratio 1.0. His congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, stroke, vascular disease, and sex (CHADSVASc) score is 4. Which medication should we use to prevent stroke in this patient?  Brief overview of the is...
Source: The Hospitalist - February 3, 2022 Category: Hospital Management Authors: Ronda Whitaker Tags: Renal & Genitourinary Source Type: research

Comparison of the Ecarin Chromogenic Assay and Diluted Thrombin Time for Quantification of Dabigatran Concentrations
ConclusionsFor detection of levels below 50 ng/mL both tests have specificities of at least 96%, suggesting that they accurately detect even low levels of drug. Therefore, regardless of whether a chromogenic or clot‐based platform is preferred, the STA‐ECA‐II and dTT are useful tests for measuring dabigatran concentrations. Unfortunately, neither test is licensed by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Although approved in other jurisdictions, the dTT and STA‐ECA‐II are not widely or rapidly available in most hospitals. Therefore, cooperation between regulators and hospitals is urgently needed to rende...
Source: Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis - October 4, 2017 Category: Hematology Authors: Iqbal H. Jaffer, Noel Chan, Robin Roberts, James C. Fredenburgh, John W. Eikelboom, Jeffrey I. Weitz Tags: Original Article ‐ Coagulation Source Type: research

Comparison of the Ecarin Chromogenic Assay and Diluted Thrombin Time for Quantification of Dabigatran Concentrations.
CONCLUSIONS: For detection of levels below 50 ng/mL both tests have specificities of at least 96%, suggesting that they accurately detect even low levels of drug. Therefore, regardless of whether a chromogenic or clot-based platform is preferred, the STA-ECA-II and dTT are useful tests for measuring dabigatran concentrations. Unfortunately, neither test is licensed by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Although approved in other jurisdictions, the dTT and STA-ECA-II are not widely or rapidly available in most hospitals. Therefore, cooperation between regulators and hospitals is urgently needed to render these ...
Source: Thrombosis and Haemostasis - October 4, 2017 Category: Hematology Authors: Jaffer IH, Chan N, Roberts R, Fredenburgh JC, Eikelboom JW, Weitz JI Tags: J Thromb Haemost Source Type: research