Editorial Comment on “Institutional Micro-Cost Comparative Analysis of Reusable vs. Single-Use Cystoscopes with assessment of environmental footprint”

Since the introduction of disposable urologic endoscopes, there has been growing interest and controversy. Single-use endoscopes can offer improved visualization with comparable performance to reusable scopes but often with high cost per device and ill-defined environmental impacts that deter surgeons, administrators and trainees. Earlier studies have focused on average cost per case, evaluating direct capital costs and indirect reprocessing costs without also accounting for the lifespan of reusable or single-use scopes.
Source: Urology - Category: Urology & Nephrology Authors: Source Type: research