Automated External Defibrillators Are Only Effective If Put to Use

In their cohort study in this issue of JAMA Internal Medicine, Kolkailah et al found that rates of bystander automated external defibrillator (AED) use were similarly low in both states that mandate and those that do not mandate such devices in recreational facilities: 19% vs 18%. The fact that cardiac arrests with ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation rhythms have significantly better odds of survival when early cardiopulmonary resuscitation is performed has likely motivated policies to expand AED availability. However, availability alone does not guarantee appropriate use by bystanders.
Source: JAMA Internal Medicine - Category: Internal Medicine Source Type: research