---
Published:05 August 2023Odontology
(2023)AbstractA
total of 20 lithium disilicate glass –ceramics (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar
Vivadent) and 20 resin nano-ceramic (Voco Grandio Blocks) onlay
restorations were performed in 20 patients using a split-mouth design to
compare the two-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate and
resin nano-ceramic onlay restorations. Both restoration s were evaluated
at baseline, one-year, and two-year clinical follow-ups based on the
modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria.
Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests showed no statistically significant
difference between Voco Grandio and IPS e.max ceramic restorations for
a ll evaluated parameters during the different follow-up periods (p > 0.05).
Cochrane’s and MC-Nemar’s tests indicated statistically significant
differences regarding color match within the Voco Grandio group. They
also indicated statistically significant differences in marginal
discoloration, marginal adaptation, surface texture, and postoperative
hyperse nsitivity within both ceramic material groups (p < 0.05).
Kaplan–Meier curve indicated that the survival rate of both ceramic
materials was 90%. After two years of clinical service, IPS e.max CAD
and Voco Grandio onlay restorations exhibited similar clinical
performance.
Source: Dental Technology Blog - Category: Dentistry Source Type: news
More News: Blogging | Dentistry | International Medicine & Public Health | Lithium | Nanotechnology | Statistics | USA Health