High-density versus low-density mapping in ablation of atypical atrial flutter

ConclusionsAcute procedural success of ablation of atypical atrial flutter is higher and the number of unmappable flutters is lower using the HD Grid mapping catheter in combination with the high-density EnSite Precision system, as compared to a decapolar circular mapping catheter and the low-density EnSite Velocity EAM system. This may lead to increased freedom from recurrent AAFL at 1 year. HD mapping is safe.
Source: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology - Category: Cardiology Source Type: research
More News: Cardiology | Stroke | Study