The Matilda Effect: Under-recognition of Women in Hematology and Oncology Awards

CONCLUSIONS: From 1994 to 2019, women were less likely to receive recognition awards from the seven major H&O societies studied compared to men. We also observed a considerably low proportion of minority awardees across all oncology subspecialties. Further studies examining how selection criteria favor either gender would be warranted in order to achieve equal representation in academic awards.IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The proportion of women in the field of hematology/oncology has increased over recent decades, but representation in leadership positions remains poor. In this study, women and minority groups were found to be underrepresented amongst award recipients. Significant disparities were seen in disciplines that have been historically male-predominant, such as basic sciences. As awards on an international level enhance academic resumes and assist with career advancement, it is important that awards are being given in an equitable manner. First steps to promote diversity and inclusion in academic medicine is reporting of gender and racial disparities in various areas of academia.PMID:34157172 | DOI:10.1002/onco.13871
Source: The Oncologist - Category: Cancer & Oncology Authors: Source Type: research