Seeing the World in Pink and Blue: Developing and Exploring a New Measure of Essentialistic Thinking about Gender

AbstractEssentialism, or the belief that certain categories have fundamental, intrinsic, and stable essences, pervasively influences social judgments. Among the many groupings that describe people, gender is the most essentialized category yet relatively little is known about individual differences in gender essentialism. To explore this construct in Study 1 with 2996  U.S. participants, we developed a new measure, named the Gender Essentialism Measure (GEM), that offers two advantages over prior measures: (a) we used Item Response Theory to optimize the measure’s psychometrics and (b) we adopted a multidimensional conceptualization, incorporating four core fa cets of gender essentialism (Biological Determinism, Social Determinism, Immutability, and Inductive Potential). Study 2 used a large U.S. sample (n = 2803) to characterize individual differences in essentialistic thinking about gender. Gender essentialism was associated with endorsement of sexism, system-justifying ideologies, relatively inflexible and dispositional thinking about others, and lesser empathic concern and perspective-taking. Studies 3 and 4, using samples of 133 and 118 U.S. participants, respectively, demonstrated that gender essentialism predicts greater acceptance of existing gender disparities. Our research indicates that understanding and addressing the societal and personal impact of gender stereotyping would be nefit from going beyond sexism to also considering the role of essentialistic t...
Source: Sex Roles - Category: International Medicine & Public Health Source Type: research