Evaluating surgical outcomes of conventional versus endoscopic septoplasty using subjective and objective methods

Conclusion: ES is more effective in terms of relief of symptoms and improvement of nasal patency. It is best for isolated spur, posterior deviation, and revision surgery, but anterior caudal dislocation is best handled with CS. Both these techniques should be taken as an adjuvant to each other.
Source: Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice - Category: Rural Health Authors: Source Type: research