Correction to: Incidental intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors and outcomes

Issues with data analysis have recently been highlighted by a reader of our article. These have been addressed with changes to Tables 2&4, as shown below, and Online Resources 5-7. T2 and peritumoral signal are no longer prognostic factors on simple pooled (Online Resource 5) and IPD (Table 4) analyses respectively. In Table 5, the number of patients which informed the outcomes symptom development and intervention were 575 and 947 respectively; 69 developed symptoms (pooled proportion %8.4 [95% CI 2.8-16.7], I2 = 88.9%). These included motor and cognitive deficits (n  = 1). We apologise to the readership of the Journal of Neuro-Oncology for these errors and thank the reader for helping us identify them.
Source: Journal of Neuro-Oncology - Category: Cancer & Oncology Source Type: research