King v. Burwell Literally Overturned Part of the Affordable Care Act

I have aletter to the editor in today ’s Washington Post:  The July 8 front-page article “Court ’s ruling on ACA could cost GOP” claimed that the Supreme Court upheld the Affordable Care Act “twice,” presumably referring to National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius in 2012 and King v. Burwell  in 2015.King v. Burwell  did not uphold the ACA. On the contrary,  King  overturned part of the ACA.The  King  plaintiffs challenged the Internal Revenue Service ’s unexplained decision to spend funds that the ACA plainly does not authorize it to spend and to impose the ACA’s mandate penalty on millions of Americans whom the plain language of the statute exempts. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. affirmed that “the most natural reading” of the operative statutory language favors the plaintiffs. In other words, the plaintiffs sued to uphold the ACA as written.The court nevertheless upheld the Obama administration ’s rewriting of the statute. In so doing, it overturned part of the ACA.Note the present tense. The ACAstill says the IRS doesn ’t have that authority. No matter.The ACA is dead. Long live ObamaCare.
Source: Cato-at-liberty - Category: American Health Authors: Source Type: blogs