Controversy and debate: memory-based methods paper 4

We appreciate the opportunity to end up this debate by rebutting the response by Edward Archer, Michael Marlow, and Carl Lavie. Once again, we want to show our deepest disagreement with their opinions and philosophical –theoretical considerations about the self reported dietary assessment methods (SR-Ms) in nutritional epidemiology. Expert debates are, without any doubt, a highly valuable tool to guarantee the progress of scientific knowledge. However, a fair debate requires that scientists conform to the truth and be unbiased in their arguments.
Source: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology - Category: Epidemiology Authors: Tags: Commentary Source Type: research